Dmitry Piliugin

Dmitry Piliugin

Dmitry Piliugin

Dmitry is a SQL Server enthusiast from Russia, Moscow. He started his journey to the world of SQL Server more than ten years ago. Most of the time he was involved as a developer of corporate information systems based on the SQL Server data platform.

Currently he works as a database developer lead, responsible for the development of production databases in a media research company. He is also an occasional speaker at various community events and tech conferences. His favorite topic to present is about the Query Processor and anything related to it. Dmitry is a Microsoft MVP for Data Platform since 2014.
Dmitry Piliugin

Latest posts by Dmitry Piliugin (see all)

Query Trace Column Values

April 23, 2018 by

Sometimes, when I saw expressions like ‘Expr1002’ or ‘WindowCount1007’ or something similar in the columns Output List of a query plan, I asked myself, is there a way to project those columns into the final result to look at the values. That question first came to me out of curiosity when I was playing with window aggregate functions and a Window Spool plan operator in SQL Server 2012, I wanted to look into the Window Spool to understand, how it performs an aggregation.

Interestingly, that SQL Server 2016 CTP3.0 allows us to look deep inside into the iterator and observe the data flowing through it. Let’s turn on an “x-ray machine” and take a look.

Read more »

Runtime Constants Sniffing

April 23, 2018 by

Most of the people know about the so-called “Parameter Sniffing”. This topic was discussed in many aspects in a number of great articles. It is interesting that not only parameters might be “sniffed” during the first execution, but also a runtime constant functions. Let’s look at the example.

Test Data

I will use a test server and administrator account to run the script below, be sure you have enough privileges on your test server if you want to try out the script below.

Read more »

Few Outer Rows Optimization

April 20, 2018 by

In this blog post, we will look at one more Nested Loops (NL) Join Post Optimization Rewrite. This time we will talk about parallel NL and Few Outer Rows Optimization.

For the demonstration purposes, I will use the enlarged version of AdventureWorks2014. In the sample query, I will also use the trace flag (TF) 8649 – this TF forces parallel plan when possible and is very convenient here, as we need one for the demo. There are also a few other undocumented TFs: TF 3604 – direct diagnostic output to console, TF 8607 – get a physical operator tree, before Post Optimization Rewrite, TF 7352 – get a tree after Post Optimization Rewrite phase.

The sample query is asking for some data based on the period’s table.

Read more »

Hash Join Execution Internals

April 17, 2018 by

Some time ago, on the 24HOP Russia I was talking about the Query Processor internals and joins. Despite I had three hours, I felt the lack of time, and something left behind, because it is a huge topic, if you try to cover it in different aspects in details. With the few next articles, I’ll try to describe some interesting parts of my talk in more details. I will start with Hash Join execution internals.

The Hash Match algorithm is one of the three available algorithms for joining two tables together. However, it is not only about joining. You may observe a complete list of the logical operations that Hash Match supports in the documentation:

Read more »

NOLOCK and Top Optimization

April 12, 2018 by

Sometimes people use nolock hint as a “turbo” button for their queries, assuming that not taking locks will speed up the query execution. There are many good articles describing all the dangerous moments of this approach, because of the read uncommitted isolation level. However, the focus of this article is a performance problem that you may encounter using nolock hint in some cases.

Let us setup some test data first.

Read more »

MTVF and CE Model Variation

April 5, 2018 by

This is a note about multi-statement table valued functions (MTVF) and how their cardinality is estimated in the new CE framework.

In the old CE framework the MTVF had fixed estimate of one row, in the new one the estimate is still fixed, however, now it is 100 rows. That’s the whole story. =)

Read more »

Overpopulated Primary Key and CE Model Variation

April 4, 2018 by

In this blog post, we are going to talk about another cardinality estimation model enhancement in SQL Server 2014 – Overpopulated Primary Key (OPK).

Consider a fact table that contains information about some sales, for example, and a date dimension table. Usually, a fact table contains the data about the current year and past years, but a dimension table usually contains the data for the next few years also.

Read more »

Join Containment Assumption and CE Model Variation

April 3, 2018 by

In this post we are going to talk about one of the model assumptions, that was changed in the new cardinality estimation mechanism in SQL Server 2014 – Join Containment Assumption.

You may find some information about this assumption in the Ian Jose’s blog post: Query Processor Modelling Extensions in SQL Server 2005 SP1, there you may find the description of the so-called simple assumption and base assumption. Another source of available information is a white paper from Joseph Sack Optimizing Your Query Plans with the SQL Server 2014 Cardinality Estimator.

Read more »

Filtered Stats and CE Model Variation

April 2, 2018 by

In this blog post, we are going to view some interesting model variation, that I’ve found while exploring the new CE.

A model variation is a new concept in the cardinality estimation framework 2014, that allows easily turn on and off some model assumptions and cardinality estimation algorithms. Model variations are based on a mechanism of pluggable heuristics and may be used in special cases. I think they are left for Microsoft support to be able to address some client’s CE issues pointwise.

Today we are going to view some interesting model variation, that creates filtered statistics on-the-fly. I should give a disclaimer here.

Read more »

Cardinality Estimation Framework Version Control

March 30, 2018 by

This is a small post about how you may control the cardinality estimator version and determine which version was used to build a plan.

The version of the cardinality framework is determined by the query database context, where the database has a specific compatibility level.

When you create a database in SQL Server 2014 it has the latest compatibility level equals 120 by default. If you issue a query in that database context, the new cardinality version will be used. You may verify this by inspecting the plan property “CardinalityEstimationModelVersion” of the root language element (the one with the green icon), SELECT, for example.

Read more »

Cardinality Estimation Process

March 29, 2018 by

In this post, we are going to take a deeper look at the cardinality estimation process. We will use SQL Server 2014, the main concepts might also be applied to the earlier versions, however, the process details are different.

Calculators

The algorithms responsible for performing the cardinality estimation in SQL Server 2014 are implemented in the classes called Calculators.

Read more »

Cardinality Estimation Concepts

March 28, 2018 by

In this blog post we are going to talk about the principles and the main concepts which are used by the optimizer to perform an estimation, and also, we will do a little bit math, so be prepared.

Base Statistics

A cardinality estimation mechanism, as a first step, usually uses base statistics to estimate the expected number of rows that should be returned from the base table. You may look at these statistics using DBCC command – DBCC SHOW_STATISTICS.

Read more »

Cardinality Estimation Place in the Optimization Process

March 27, 2018 by

In this blog post, I’m going to look at the place of the Cardinality Estimation Process in the whole Optimization Process. We’ll see some internals, that will show us, why the Query Optimizer is so sensitive to the cardinality estimation. To understand that we should observe the main steps that a server performs when the query is sent for execution.

Plan Construction Process

Below you may see the picture of the general plan-building process in SQL Server from the moment when a server receives a query till the storage engine is ready to retrieve the data. Take a quick look first, and next I’ll provide explanations.

Read more »

Cardinality Estimation Role

March 26, 2018 by

This post opens a series of blog posts dedicated to my observations of the new cardinality estimator in SQL Server 2014. But, before we jump to the new features, I’d like to provide some background, to make the next posts clearer.

We’ll start by discussing the role of Cardinality Estimation in SQL Server, trying to answer – what is it and why it is needed.

Read more »